Our team has advised on thousands of deals in Asia Pacific and globally, making us an industry leader in crafting and negotiating policies to insure unknown breaches of warranty and indemnity, as well as known tax, legal, and intangible asset risks.
Our leadership team has been at the forefront of the transaction insurance industry for the past decade. Collectively, we bring more than 100 years of experience as both corporate attorneys and transaction liability advisory insurance brokers, specializing in private equity and corporate acquisitions and exits across all industry sectors and all major M&A jurisdictions.

W&I Insurance
Tax Insurance
Title Insurance
Intangible Asset & Contingent Risk Insurance
Typical W&I policy coverage:
10%-20% of purchase price (but may be able to insure up to 100% - the buyer can arrange this direct with the insurer without seller involvement)
Can top-up limit for fundamentals only (again – the buyer can arrange this direct with the insurer without seller involvement)
Seller can get nil recourse (ex-fraud) and nil escrow.
Typical SPA indemnification coverage:
5-10%% of purchase price for general warranties.
Seller often required to provide100% cap for fundamental warranties.
Typical W&I policy coverage:
Inclusion of consequential damages, DIV, multiplied damages and similar damages is heavily negotiated.
Typical SPA indemnification coverage:
Most insurers are willing to follow silence as long as the purchase agreement does not explicitly grant/exclude such damages.
Typical W&I policy coverage:
Materiality scrape not that common in the purchase agreement – exception rather than the norm.
Typical SPA indemnification coverage:
When the purchase agreement does have a materiality scrape, most insurers are willing to follow this.
Typical W&I policy coverage:
Buyer's recourse is to proceed against the escrow, which may include proceeds owed to management/rollover sellers.
Typical SPA indemnification coverage:
After retention is satisfied, the policy will respond to all covered matters. Buyer has right (but not obligation) to proceed against the seller to satisfy part of the retention, subject to the terms of the purchase agreement. In practice the buyer claims directly against the insurer and not the seller.
Head of M&A, Transaction Liability Asia Pacific
terence.montgomery@lockton.com
Vice President, Transaction Liability Asia Pacific
giovanni.colistra@lockton.com